Legal Opinion
Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 2001No. H020900, H020933PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
In this CEQA 1 case, the project applicants, real parties in interest September Ranch Partners, appeal from a judgment granting two petitions for a writ of mandate. The superior court found that the project’s environmental impact report (EIR) was legally inadequate under CEQA and directed that the Monterey County Board of Supervisors (the Board) vacate certification of the EIR and prepare and circulate a legally adequate EIR with respect to specified water and traffic issues. Appellants argue that the Board’s certification of the EIR must be upheld because the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.