Legal Opinion
Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 2012No. D055215; No. D061030PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McConnell, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Preserve Wild Santee, Center for Biological Diversity, and Endangered Habitats League, Inc. (collectively, plaintiffs), challenged the certification by the City of Santee (City) of a final environmental impact report (EIR) for a development project in the City’s Fanita Ranch area (project), claiming the project failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) in several respects.1 The trial court found merit to one claim—that there was insufficient evidence to support the EIR’s conclusion the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- South of Mkt. Cmty. Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Latinos Unidos De Napa v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.