Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 2015No. C072486; C072790; C073011PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Facing for the first time a requirement to review for environmental impacts its statutorily mandated fish hatchery and stocking enterprise that has been in operation for more than 100 years, California’s Department of Fish and Wildlife (the Department) chose to use a program environmental impact report (EIR) to analyze the enterprise’s impacts on a statewide basis. Instead of addressing impacts on specific locations the Department stocked, the EIR addressed the enterprise’s continuing and potential impacts on individual species that could be located at many…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- South of Mkt. Cmty. Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Cal. Dep't of Conservation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Missionary Guadalupanas of the Holy Spirit Inc. v. Rouillard, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.