Legal Opinion
Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 2014No. A137828PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
In this petition for writ of mandate, appellant Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island (CSTI) contends that respondents City and County of San Francisco (City) 1 and respondent and real party in interest Treasure Island Development Authority (TIDA) 2 failed to certify a legally adequate environmental impact report (EIR) for the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Project (the Project), and therefore violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). 3 The Project, which was unanimously approved by the City’s…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of Governments, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Stopthemillenniumhollywood.Com. v. City of L.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.