Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*421Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
The County of Sacramento (County) approved a community plan for a large, mixed-use development project proposed by real parties in interest in this mandate action (real parties), as well as a specific plan for the first portion of that development. A group of objectors to the development (plaintiffs) brought a petition for writ of mandate to overturn, on a variety of grounds, the County’s approval. The superior court denied the petition, and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
We granted review to consider plaintiffs’ claims, arising under the California Environmental Quality Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Sierra Club v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.