Legal Opinion

Spruce v. Wellman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1950No. Civ. 17320PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON,

J.—Action for personal injuries against Irene E. Wellman, The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Francis Shade Connelly, the latter’s employee. After trial by jury a verdict was rendered in favor of defendants Telephone Company and Connelly. Judgment was entered on the verdict.

Plaintiff’s injuries resulted from a collision between an automobile driven by Ernest L. Wellman and a truck owned by the telephone company and driven by Connelly while in the course of performing his duties as an employee.

In due time plaintiff filed a “notice of motion for a new trial” which is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Freeman v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Village Development Co. v. FiliceNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Coffee v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ChurchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API