Deiter v. Kiser
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Benito County and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Dooling, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. M. Gardner, W. C. Kennedy, and A. D. Shaw, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The complaint alleged that a deed of certain mining property was made by defendants to E. E. Bray, and deposited in escrow; that the deed was, thereafter, fraudulently altered at the instance of defendants, and'was, after its delivery, filed for record on behalf of the grantee, who was ignorant of the alteration. The plaintiff, claiming as successor in interest of E. E. Bray, sought a reformation of the deed. The defendants answered, denying the allegations of the complaint, and filed a cross-complaint by which they sought, as against Deiter, E. E. Bray and F. W. Bray, a decree that the deed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Judson v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Moyle v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Estate of TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Pedlar v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Smith v. Bear Valley Milling & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Swartfager v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Estate of LanzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.