Legal Opinion

Webster v. Somer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1911No. S.P. No. 5320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to quiet plaintiffs title to a lot of land 75x150 feet on London Street in the city and county of San Francisco. Defendant had judgment that he was the absolute owner thereof and enjoining plaintiff from claiming any interest therein. This is an appeal by plaintiff from such judgment.

It is contended that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to set aside his default for not answering, after his demurrer to plaintiffs complaint had been overruled with leave to him to answer within twenty days. The demurrer was overruled September 27, .1907, and notice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Los Angeles Bill Posting Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Klumpke v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Barrett v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Gallash v. WillisMontana Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API