Legal Opinion

Routh v. Quinn

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1942No. L. A. 18215PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The controversy presented by this appeal is whether a tax assessor, his deputy and bondsman are liable to a purchaser of personal property at a delinquent tax sale for damages suffered by him due to the invalidity of the sale alleged to have resulted from negligence on the part of the assessor and his deputy in the computation of the tax payable.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’ demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.

Plaintiff charged in his complaint that on June 24, 1938, defendants county tax assessor and his deputy sold to plaintiff certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dahms v. General Elevator Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Nicolosi v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Youst v. LongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API