Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. City of Newport Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1936No. L. A. 15141PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the City of Newport Beach to quiet her title to two lots within the bounds of said city. The court found that the lots were tidelands in Newport Bay. The" judgment provided that plaintiff was the owner in fee of said lots, “subject to an easement in favor of the public for right of navigation and fishery only, but without any right in the public or any public agency to make any physical changes or improvements therein or thereon without the exercise of eminent domain”. It further adjudged that defendant city had no right, title or interest in said land.

The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People Ex Rel. Baker v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Bohn v. AlbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API