Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Los Angeles Bill Posting Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This is an appeal from an order vacating the default of defendants and setting aside a judgment against them through such default. It is claimed that the court abused its discretion, and that the facts were not such as to justify the court in making the order. The facts disclosed were such that the court might well have denied the motion. But we do not possess the discretion that is necessarily vested in the trial court, and, although we might have differed from the court in the conclusions reached if we had passed upon the evidence in the first instance, here we must determine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fulweiler v. Hog's Back Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by18 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Downing v. Klondike Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Winchester v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Matter of TraceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.