Fox v. Townsend
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinions of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain lots of land, claiming title thereto under and by virtue of certain *53tax-sales to the state of California and deeds from the state of California to him. The court gave its decree against the claim of plaintiff, and he appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
One of the lots in question was lot 19 in block 26. The assessment of this lot, upon which the tax-sale was based, shows that there was no dollar-mark, or other mark, sign, word, abbreviation or explanation on the assessment-roll to indicate what was meant by the figures in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. San Francisco Sav. UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Douglass v. NuzumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Thompson v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Hinds v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.