Legal Opinion
Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1946No. L. A. 19169PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff and defendants have instituted separate appeals from a money judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in an action brought to recover taxes paid under protest, which appeals have been consolidated.
Plaintiff is the owner of a building leased to the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association. Defendants are the county of Los Angeles and the city of Los Angeles. Section 5219 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C.A. § 548) permits the taxation of real property belonging to national banking associations “to the same extent, according to its value, as other real…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Louis Stores, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.