Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Mayberry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 21, 1924No. Nos. 14029, 14030, ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THOMPSON, C.
This is an appeal by I. O. Stuart, O. H. Ruble, J. W. Thompson, J. E. Bruin, and Irene E. Upton from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., in favor of Henry May-berry, setting aside certain deeds executed by Henry Mayberry to I. O. Stuart and O. H. Ruble, and by Henry Mayberry to J. W. Thompson, J. E. Bruin, and Irene E. Upton to Henry Mayberry’s allotment in the Creek Nation -as a Creqk freedman, consisting of 160 acres, on the grounds of fraud and incompetency, there being two separate appeals numbered 14029 and 14030, on the docket of this court,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Long v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. LangstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Engleman v. Deputy MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. GulagerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Dunkin v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Kirkes v. AskewDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- Badger v. DukesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.