Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; ■ Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Company against B. L. Love. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHAKP, C.
This case presents error from the superior court of Muskogee county, where at the trial plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant in the sum of $2,050. It is urged that the alleged contract entered into between T. E. Kirkbride and defendant Love, being for the benefit of the plaintiff corporation, cannot be enforced because the Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Company, defendant in error, was not a party to the contract, and that T. E. Kirkbride was under no obligation to -it, and that the alleged contract, not being in writing, under tire statute of frauds was null and void,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Mitchell v. MilhoanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Pape v. Capitol BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.