Legal Opinion

Dunkin v. Rice

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1946No. 32212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs are grandchildren of Sarah C. Dunkin, deceased, and are children of Sarah’s two daughters who had died prior to her death. The defendants are Sarah’s children who were living at the time of her death. Plaintiffs’ action was to cancel certain deeds made to defendants by Sarah shortly prior to her death. They asserted that the defendants prevailed upon their mother to execute the deeds to them at a time when she was mentally incapable. Plaintiffs recovered judgment in the trial court, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Stuart v. MayberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Rice v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Rodesney v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Rose v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Hutchings v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API