Legal Opinion
Engleman v. Deputy Murray
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2008No. 07-2060PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Stephen James Engleman brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against “Deputy Murray”1 of the Benton County Sheriffs *946Office, alleging that the Arkansas deputy-violated Engleman’s Fourth Amendment rights by arresting him in Oklahoma on an Arkansas warrant. The district court denied Deputy Murray’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and Deputy Murray brought an interlocutory appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse.
1. BACKGROUND
On January 11, 2005, Engleman dialed 911, and his call was routed to the Benton County Sheriffs Office in Arkansas.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Williams v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Stuart Wright v. Sean FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Gabriel WerdeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Cecilia Perry v. Jermanda AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.