Badger v. Dukes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This is an action, commenced in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover the sum of $600. The plaintiff in his petition alleged, in substance, that in September, 1923, he sold about 4 miles of 2 inch pipe to Hamilton and Church, a copartnership composed of H. B» Hamilton and Virgil Church, and took from them, representing the balance of the purchase price thereof, a note in the sum of $1,612.50, the note being secured by a chattel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Amons v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Testerman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Cummins v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936