First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. Langston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Johnston County Court; Nick Wolfe, Judge. ■ Action by W. R. Langston against the First National Bank ■of Mill Creek. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings •error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The first assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to quash the sheriff’s return of service. It is shown by the return that the summons with all indorsements thereon was delivered in person to B. H. Graves, cashier of the First National Bank of Mill Creek; the president of said bank nofbeing found. We think this form of substituted service of summons is a sufficient compliance with section 5604, Comp. Laws 1909. The summons issued out of the county court of Johnston county directed to the sheriff of that county, and was made returnable on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haseltine v. Central Bank of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cooper v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Daniel H. Talbot, Plff. In Err. v. Sioux National Bank of Sioux City, IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mason v. SloneckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.