First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J. —
The petitioner seeks the writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent superior court from exercising jurisdiction in a pending action until it has ordered the presence of parties claimed to be indispensable to a complete determination of the controversy. (See section 389, Code of Civil Procedure.) This court issued the alternative writ. The matter is submitted on the petition and the respondent’s demurrer and answer.
The pleadings herein show that on March 15, 1941, Sallyneil B. Wilson commenced an action in the Superior Court in Los Angeles County naming The First National Trust…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Fitts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Nordin v. ZimmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Kaczorowski v. Mendocino County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.