Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Prohibition. On September 11, 1929, an action was commenced in the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles, entitled People of the State of California, on Relation of Fred G. Stevenot, Director of Natural Resources of the State of California, v. Associated Oil Company et al., including among the defendants the petitioners herein. The purpose of the action was and is to enjoin the defendants therein, numbering forty-two and more of the persons, firms, associations and corporations operating oil and gas wells in the Santa Fe Springs area in said county, from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.