Legal Opinion

Bank of California v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1940No. S. F. 16436PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of prohibition, to restrain the respondent superior court from proceeding with the trial of an action without bringing in certain parties alleged to be “necessary and indispensable”.

Sara M. Boyd, the widow of Colin M. Boyd, died testate in June, 1937, leaving an estate valued at about $225,000. On July 8, 1937, in the superior court in San Francisco, her will was admitted to probate, and petitioner, Bank of California, was appointed executor. The will left individual legacies and bequests amounting to $60,000 to a large number of legatees, including charitable…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hartley v. LangkampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API