Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1955No. S. F. 19122; S. F. 19123PublishedCited by 85 opinions

John Francis Neylan and John F. Duff for Petitioners in S. F. No. 19122.

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Some of the beneficiaries of a trust established by Henry Miller brought a suit for removal of the trustees and for additional relief. Respondent court appointed a receiver, accepted the resignations of two trustees, removed the third trustee and appointed successor trustees. This proceeding was then commenced by other beneficiaries to prohibit further steps from being taken in that action and to have the orders already made declared null and void.

Under the terms of the trust, the income was payable for life to Henry Miller and. then for life to his daughter and son-in-law, Nellie Miller…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API