Legal Opinion

Farmers Ins. Exchange v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1985No. H000211PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

—This action arises out of the Mediterranean fruit fly eradication program. The chemical mixture employed by the state in its wide-scale aerial spraying caused erosion of the painted surface of automobiles. Plaintiffs/appellants are five insurance companies which were obliged to pay numerous claims of their policy holders for costs of new paint jobs. By this action they seek recompense from the state.

Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint stated eight causes of action. Three defendants—the state, the State Controller Kenneth Cory, and Jerry Scrib ner, the project manager of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Home Budget Loans, Inc. v. Jacoby & Meyers Law OfficesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API