Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1990No. S004037PublishedCited by 345 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

We are called upon to decide whether a cause of action in tort may be stated for intentional interference with contractual relations or intentional interference with prospective economic advantage when it is alleged defendant induced a party to a contract to seek a judicial determination whether it may terminate the contract according to its terms.

We have concluded that to allow either cause of action to be stated when the only interference alleged is that defendant induced the bringing of potentially meritorious litigation would be an unwarranted expansion of the scope of…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by345 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API