Customer Co. v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
A felony suspect, reputed to be armed and dangerous, took refuge in a store and refused to surrender. In the course of apprehending the suspect, the police fired tear gas into the store, causing extensive property damage. The issue we address is whether the owner of the store may bring an action for inverse condemnation against the public entities that employed the law enforcement officers, on the theory that the damage caused by the officers constituted a taking or damaging of private property for public use within the meaning of the “just compensation” clause of the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Santa Monica v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Akins v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- TrinCo Investment Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.