ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut Creek
California Supreme Court
Daniel J. Curtin, Jr., City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Section 11546 of the Business and Professions Code authorizes the governing body of a city or county to require that a subdivider must, as a condition to the approval of a subdivision map, dedicate land or pay fees in lieu thereof for park or recreational purposes. In this class action for declaratory and injunctive relief, Associated Home Builders of the Greater East Bay, Incorporated (hereinafter called Associated) 1 challenges the constitutionality of section 11546 as well as legislation passed by the City of Walnut Creek to implement the section. It is also asserted that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Jordan v. Village of Menomonee FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Billings Properties, Inc. v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Jenad, Inc. v. Village of ScarsdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.