House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court had sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s first amended complaint without leave to amend.
The plaintiff, as the owner of certain land in Los Angeles County adjacent to the Los Angeles River, undertakes to state a cause of action based upon damages to her property by reason of the negligence of the defendant district in its planning, construction and maintenance of certain flood control channel work in said river. She rests her right of recovery upon article I, section 14, of the state Constitution, which provides…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Varney & Green v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.