Legal Opinion
Laabs v. City of Victorville
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 2008No. E040778PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1247Opinion
KING, J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Amanda Laabs was injured in an automobile collision. She sued various parties, including the County of San Bernardino (the County) and the City of Victorville (the City). As against these governmental entities, she alleged that her injuries were caused by a dangerous condition of public property for purposes of Government Code sections 830 and 835.1 The City moved for summary judgment, which the court granted. The court subsequently denied the City’s motion for defense costs (pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 1038) and expenses incurred in proving matters…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Hampton v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hutton v. Fidelity National Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.