Legal Opinion

Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2016No. G050438PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

— Defendant and appellant CWPSC, Inc. (CW Painting), appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel its former employee, plaintiff and respondent Martha Carbajal, to arbitrate her wage and hour claims under the arbitration provision in her employment agreement. The trial court denied the motion because it found the arbitration provision was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. We agree with the trial court.

The arbitration provision is procedurally unconscionable because it is part of an adhesion contract CW Painting imposed on Carbajal as a term…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Farrar v. Direct Commerce, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Beltran v. AuPairCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Subcontracting Concepts (CT), LLC v. De Melo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API