Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Arceneaux

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1990No. S010627PublishedCited by 279 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Does a litigant who fails to bring to the attention of the trial court alleged deficiencies in the court’s statement of decision waive the right to complain of such errors on appeal, thereby allowing the appellate court to make implied findings in favor of the prevailing party? We conclude that a waiver occurs in these circumstances pursuant to section 634 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

In a dissolution action, the trial court orally announced its intended decision on January 28, 1986. Husband filed a request for a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Munoz v. OlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by279 opinions

  1. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API