Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1180Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
Plaintiff Kimberly Aleksick, individually and on behalf of a class of those similarly situated, appeals a judgment following an order granting defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.’s (7-Eleven) motion for summary judgment. 7-Eleven provides payroll services to its franchisees. Aleksick contends reversal is required because 7-Eleven’s payroll system violates both the “unlawful” and “unfair” prongs of Business and Professions Code section 17200.1 Specifically, she asserts that 7-Eleven’s practice of converting any partial hour worked in a pay period from minutes to hundredths of an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Zhang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.