Legal Opinion

Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2012No. D059236PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1180Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

Plaintiff Kimberly Aleksick, individually and on behalf of a class of those similarly situated, appeals a judgment following an order granting defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.’s (7-Eleven) motion for summary judgment. 7-Eleven provides payroll services to its franchisees. Aleksick contends reversal is required because 7-Eleven’s payroll system violates both the “unlawful” and “unfair” prongs of Business and Professions Code section 17200.1 Specifically, she asserts that 7-Eleven’s practice of converting any partial hour worked in a pay period from minutes to hundredths of an…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Zhang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API