Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Fidelity National Title Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 2013No. Nos. F063318, F063922PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

Plaintiff Brent Hutton sued defendant Fidelity National Title Company, the escrow company used in plaintiff’s refinance of his home loan, for allegedly charging a notary fee in excess of the amount permitted by Government Code section 8211.1 Under that statute, a notary may charge only $10 per signature for “taking an acknowledgment.” (Id., subd. (a).)2 Since only two acknowledgments were taken by the notary in connection with plaintiff’s loan refinance (with only one signature notarized as to each acknowledgement), plaintiff asserted that defendant violated the statute by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Cal. Bank & Trust v. Lawlor CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Goddard v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Martine v. Heavenly Valley Ltd. P'ship, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API