AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank
California Court of Appeal
[Certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, Acting P. J.
I
In this case we determine that defendants Crocker Bank and its employees are not liable for wrongful dishonor of checks drawn against an account when the bank complies with its account agreement when faced with conflicting demands by the signatories on the account. We accordingly affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants.
II
Scope of Review
Since a summary judgment motion raises only questions of law regarding the construction and effect of the supporting and opposing papers, we independently review them on appeal, applying the same…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.