Legal Opinion

In Re Schwartz

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1982No. L.A. 31489PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review a recommendation of the State Bar Court that petitioner Bill David Schwartz be disbarred from the practice of law because of the circumstances surrounding a crime involving moral turpitude and because of his conviction therefor. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the factual findings of the State Bar Court and claims that disbarment is unwarranted because his conduct did not involve moral turpitude and because of various mitigating circumstances. We conclude otherwise.

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law on October 22, 1975, and has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re MennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API