Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Menna

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1995No. S038139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Joseph Menna (hereafter applicant) is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in New Jersey as a result of his felony convictions for theft of client funds, failure to file a state income tax return, and manufacture of methamphetamine.

Subsequent to his disbarment, he moved to California, passed the bar examination, and sought admission to the State Bar. After a preliminary investigation, the Committee of Bar Examiners (hereafter referred to occasionally as Committee) declined to recommend him for admission and referred the matter for a formal hearing before the State…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tardiff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Tomlinson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Sander v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re CogginSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re Garcia on AdmissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API