In Re Higbie
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
In this disciplinary proceeding we must consider whether the course of conduct of an attorney culminating in his conviction for failure to pay a federal marijuana transfer tax involves moral turpitude, and if so, the nature and extent of the appropriate discipline. We conclude that failure to pay the tax does not constitute moral turpitude per se, but that respondent attorney’s conduct does reflect moral turpitude. Because the dominant legitimate motivation for respondent’s wrongful behavior was apparently not personal profit and because respondent’s professional record…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.