In Re Crooks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
We review the augmented report and recommendations of the Review Department of the State Bar Court of California (review department) that John Elbert Crooks’s (Crooks) violation of 18 United States Code section 371 be deemed to have involved moral turpitude and that Crooks be disbarred from the practice of law. After reviewing the record and Crooks’s contentions, we adopt the recommendation of the review department.
I
Facts and Proceedings Below
Crooks was admitted to the practice of law in California in 1933. On June 14, 1984, Crooks was convicted in the United States District…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Brooks v. Hilton Casinos Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re BirdwellTexas Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.