Legal Opinion

In Re Lamb

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1989No. S007499PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Laura Beth Lamb was admitted to practice in December 1983. She has no prior record of discipline. On November 13, 1986, she pled nolo contendere to two felony counts of false personation to obtain a benefit. (Pen. Code, § 529, subd. 3.) The charges arose from allegations that petitioner took the July 1985 bar examination for her husband.

Upon receiving the record of conviction, we referred the matter to the State Bar for a determination whether the misconduct involved moral turpitude and, if so, what discipline should be imposed. Among other things, the parties…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Baker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re RivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ligon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. In Re NaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API