Legal Opinion
Pekarsky v. Ariyoshi
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 28, 1983No. Civ. 76-0455PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on remand from the court of appeals. In its prior order, the Court awarded attorneys’ fees and costs against all defendants, including appellants Ariyoshi, Minami and Chun (“State defendants”) and the eight members of the Dental Board of Examiners in their official capacity (“Dental Board defendants”). Plaintiffs had charged defendants with discrimination against Caucasians and new or non-residents of Hawaii in the administration of the state’s dental testing and licensing procedures. The defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Mendoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Tom Riddell, Jr. v. The National Democratic Party, Cross-Appellants v. William F. Winter, Governor of the State of Mississippi, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Blue ShieldDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate Of Bernice Pauahi BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop ex rel. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Willis v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005