Legal Opinion
Mendoza v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1980No. 78-3352PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The plaintiff-objector-appellant Alberto Sanchez, appearing individually and on behalf of his above-named minors, appeals the District Court’s orders entered on August 11, 1978, which approved a submitted plan of desegregation, and August 31, 1978, which approved the settlement arrangement for desegregation of the Tucson School District No. 1. He also appeals the District Court’s order of August 11, 1978, which denied the certification of a subclass and various other discovery and post-August 1, 1978 orders of the District Court. We affirm each of the orders appealed from.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.