Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop ex rel. Peters
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This case involves an award of attorneys’ fees to defendants. Plaintiffs Kona Enterprises, Inc. (“Kona”), Tach One, Balanced Value Fund (“BVF”), Wayne M. Rogers (“Rogers”), and Jack Gertino (“Gertino”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order granting defen*880dants’1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d) motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to Haw.Rev.Stat. § 607-14.2 Plaintiffs challenge the district court’s determinations under Hawai’i law that plaintiffs’ entire action is “in the nature of assumpsit,” that Rogers, Gertino, Tach One, and BVF are each “losing parties,”…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate Of Bernice Pauahi BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Aguirre Guerra v. Dematic Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Allstate Insurance Company v. NassiriDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Andrich v. Navient Solutions IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.