Legal Opinion
Willis v. City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 27, 2005No. C 04-2305 VRWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
On July 26, 2005, the court entered an order finding that plaintiffs’ counsel John L Burris and Miles Washington should be sanctioned pursuant to 28 USC § 1927 and FRCP 11. Doc #36. The July 26, 2005, order is hereby VACATED. This order shall supersede the July 26, 2005 order.
For the reasons discussed below, the court SANCTIONS Messrs Burris and Washington pursuant to FRCP 11. The court OR*598DERS Burris and Washington to pay $10,800 to the court on or before November 15, 2005.
I
On June 19, 2005, the court ordered Burris and Washington to show cause why they should not be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.