Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Luebke
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1986No. OSB 83-125, 84-52; SC S32747PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The accused is charged with violation of DR 5-104(A) in two separate transactions with two separate clients. That disciplinary rule at the time of those transactions provided:
“A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client if they have differing interests therein and if the client expects the lawyer to exercise his professional judgment therein for the protection of the client, unless the client has consented after full disclosure.” 1
In its first cause, the Bar alleges that a woman named Baker was the accused’s client, that she lent money to a corporation in which the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of Discipline of MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GermundsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KisslingOregon Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.