Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Coe
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1987No. OSB 82-132; SC S33212PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar (Bar) has charged the accused with violation of former DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 7-102(A)(8) and DR 2-110(A)(l) and (A)(2) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, all in connection with his conduct as personal representative and attorney in the probate of the estate of Edith Matney. In general, the complaint charges that the accused improperly paid to himself attorney and personal representative fees and left the county and abandoned his practice without concluding probate or arranging that it be done.
The Bar filed its complaint on March 13, 1986. The accused was served by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Lachmund's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReckerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.