Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Germundson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1986No. OSB 83-123, SC S32175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar charges Roger C. Ger-mundson, a member of the bar, with violations of several disciplinary rules relating to a client and later to the client’s estate. The charges concern conflicts of interest in borrowing money from the client and conduct involving misrepresentation in executing notes for those debts in the name of certain businesses without authority to do so. The accused pleads alcoholism in mitigation.

We summarize the course of events, which is largely undisputed, from the findings of the trial panel appointed by the Disciplinary Board.

The accused represented…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lawrence L. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API