Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Whipple

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1983No. SC 29728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney discipline case involving a loan from a client to the lawyer. The lawyer is accused of violating DR5-104(A) which provides:

“A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client if they have differing interests therein and if the client expects the lawyer to exercise his professional judgment therein for the protection of the client, unless the client has consented after full disclosure.”

In both In re Drake, 292 Or 704, 642 P2d 296 (1982) and In re Montgomery, 292 Or 796, 643 P2d 338 (1982) we analyzed the violation of DR5-104(A) by dividing the rule into four…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re ScannellOregon Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of O'ByrneOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API