Legal Opinion

Bostic v. Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 87-455PublishedCited by 412 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

This appeal presents us with an issue that often arises in workers’ compensation cases: whether the relationship of someone to an employer is that of master-servant or independent contractor. Because an independent contractor is not an employee for purposes of workers’ compensation law, the resolution of this question determines the employer’s obligation to contribute to, and the applicant’s eligibility for benefits from, the State Insurance Fund. In this appeal, we are first called upon to decide whether the trial court erred in submitting this issue to the jury.

Whether someone is an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by412 opinions

  1. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. SallieOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

407 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API