Legal Opinion

Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1978No. 77-637PublishedCited by 1,776 opinions

1Per curiam

Civ. R. 56(E) provides, in relevant part:

“* * * "When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but his response, by affidavit or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be •entered against him.”

Given the requirement of Civ. R. 56(E)1 that a party *66set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue' for trial, that party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olverson v. ButlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State ex rel. City of Garfield Heights v. NadratowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1,776 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1,771 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API