Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1996No. 95-846PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We are required by R.C. 2929.05(A) to undertake a three-prong analysis in all death penalty cases. First, we must review each of the nine propositions of law raised by appellant. Second, we must independently review the record to determine whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors. Finally, we must independently determine whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the court of appeals in part, and affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

In Proposition of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BuggsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API